site stats

Hitesh bhatnagar v deepa bhatnagar

WebHitesh Bhatnagar — Appellant versus Deepa Bhatnagar — Respondent Civil Appeal No. 6288 of 2008 Decided on : 18-4-2011 IMPORTANT POINT Irretrievable breakdown of … Web1 AIR 1992 SC 1904 MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with …

Judgments - roundup.manupatra.in

WebIt would also be apt to mention that the Apex Court recently while dealing with the case of divorce by mutual consent in the case of Hitesh Bhatnagar vs. Deepa Bhatnagar decided on 18.4.2011 has held that the said period of 18 months has been specified only to ensure quick disposal of cases of divorce by mutual consent and not to specify the period for … Web24 set 2024 · Hitesh Bhatnagar vs Deepa Bhatnagar on 18 April, 2011 Law Point: IRBM turned down, infinitesimal chance for the marriage to survive. JUDGEMENT 1) Marriages … tower mixer tap https://highpointautosalesnj.com

Is Unilateral Withdrawal Of Consent From A Petition …

WebHitesh Bhatnagar Versus Deepa Bhatnagar Civil Appeal No. 6288 of 2008, decided on 18.04.2011 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Sec. 13-B — Divorce by mutual consent — Whether the consent once given in a petition for divorce by mutual consent can be subsequently withdrawn by one of the parties after 18 months from the date of filing of the petition ... Web3 mar 2024 · The constitutionality of Section 13B was upheld in the case of Miten v. ... Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, A.I.R. 2011 S.C. 1637 (India). CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5952 OF 2009 (India). CIVIL APPEAL NO 11158 OF 2024 (India). Section 28 Appeals from decrees and orders: WebHitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, (2011) 5 SCC 234 – Unilateral withdrawal of consent after 18 months in S. 13-B, Hindu Marriage Act petition valid... tower mixer

No divorce if either spouse withdraws consent:SC Deccan Herald

Category:JUDGMENT - livelaw.in

Tags:Hitesh bhatnagar v deepa bhatnagar

Hitesh bhatnagar v deepa bhatnagar

Hitesh Bhatnagar Vs Deepa Bhatnagar - latestlaws.com

Web18 apr 2011 · Mr. Hitesh Bhatnagar-in-Person and Mr. Devendra Singh, Advocates, for the Appellant. Ms. Deepa Bhatnagar-in-Person, Mr. Harshvir Pratap Sharma, Mr. Sharad … Webirretrievably broken down. In the case of Hitesh Bhatnagar (supra), it is noted by this Court that Courts can dissolve a marriage as irretrievably broken down only when it is …

Hitesh bhatnagar v deepa bhatnagar

Did you know?

Web18 apr 2011 · Hitesh Bhatnagar vs Deepa Bhatnagar Supreme Court of India on 18.04.11 the parties filed a petition under Section 13B of the Act before the District Court, Gurgaon, for dissolution of the marriage by grant of a decree of divorce by mutual consent. Web23 ago 2011 · Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, AIR 2011 SC 1637). 21. Respondent no.2, who did not change her stand in the second motion and obtained a sham decree of divorce as alleged by her asked the criminal court to sit in appeal against the judgment and decree of the competent Civil Court.

Web14 feb 2024 · The joint petition was filed during the pendency of the petition filed by the husband seeking a divorce. The Family Court relied on the Supreme Court’s judgement in Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, which held that the wife was free to withdraw her consent at any time before the passing of the decree. WebHitesh Bhatnagar VS Deepa Bhatnagar JUDGMENT Hon'ble DATTU, J.— Marriages are made in heaven, or so it is said. But we are more often than not made to wonder what …

Web26 apr 2011 · REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO 6288 OF 2008 Hitesh Bhatnagar Appellant versus Deepa ... THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPEALATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO 6288 OF 2008 Hitesh Bhatnagar Appellant versus Deepa Bhatnagar … WebIn Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, the Supreme Court had held that mutual consent to the divorce is a sine quo non for passing a decree for divorce, which should continue till the passing of the decree and is a …

Hitesh Bhatnagar vs Deepa Bhatnagar on 18 April, 2011 Share Link Mobile View Premium MembersAdvanced SearchCase Removal Cites 15 docs - [View All] Section 13B in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Article 142 in The Constitution Of India 1949 Section 13B(2) in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955

Web6 apr 2024 · Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar (2011) In this case, the High Court of Delhi held that a marriage can be considered void if it is not consummated due to the psychological incapacity of one of the parties, even if the incapacity is not classified as a mental disorder. powerapps videos by anilWeb14 set 2024 · Deepa Bhatnagar, (2011) 5 SCC 234, to explain that “courts can dissolve a marriage as irretrievably broken down only when it is impossible to save the marriage, all … powerapps vertical text labelWeb"Marriages are made in heaven, or so it is said. But we are more often than not made to wonder what happens to them by the time they descend down to earth." -H.L. Dattu, J. in … power apps versions restoreWebHITESH BHATNAGAR v. DEEPA HITESH BHATNAGAR v. DEEPA BHATNAGAR[H.L. DATTU, J.]3. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties andsince tower mn 14 day weatherWebHitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar [AIR 2011 SC 1637] held that the respondent was free to withdraw her consent at any time before the passing of the decree. Accordingly, … power apps versus power biWeb, 2011 Latest Caselaw 317 SC tower mixer reviewsWebPart No.I - Supreme Court of India . Part No.I - Supreme Court of India . SHOW MORE powerapps video