WebHitesh Bhatnagar — Appellant versus Deepa Bhatnagar — Respondent Civil Appeal No. 6288 of 2008 Decided on : 18-4-2011 IMPORTANT POINT Irretrievable breakdown of … Web1 AIR 1992 SC 1904 MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar on being satisfied, after hearing the parties and making such inquiry as it thinks fit, that a marriage has been solemnized and that the averments in the petition are true, pass a decree of divorce declaring the marriage to be dissolved with …
Judgments - roundup.manupatra.in
WebIt would also be apt to mention that the Apex Court recently while dealing with the case of divorce by mutual consent in the case of Hitesh Bhatnagar vs. Deepa Bhatnagar decided on 18.4.2011 has held that the said period of 18 months has been specified only to ensure quick disposal of cases of divorce by mutual consent and not to specify the period for … Web24 set 2024 · Hitesh Bhatnagar vs Deepa Bhatnagar on 18 April, 2011 Law Point: IRBM turned down, infinitesimal chance for the marriage to survive. JUDGEMENT 1) Marriages … tower mixer tap
Is Unilateral Withdrawal Of Consent From A Petition …
WebHitesh Bhatnagar Versus Deepa Bhatnagar Civil Appeal No. 6288 of 2008, decided on 18.04.2011 Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Sec. 13-B — Divorce by mutual consent — Whether the consent once given in a petition for divorce by mutual consent can be subsequently withdrawn by one of the parties after 18 months from the date of filing of the petition ... Web3 mar 2024 · The constitutionality of Section 13B was upheld in the case of Miten v. ... Hitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, A.I.R. 2011 S.C. 1637 (India). CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5952 OF 2009 (India). CIVIL APPEAL NO 11158 OF 2024 (India). Section 28 Appeals from decrees and orders: WebHitesh Bhatnagar v. Deepa Bhatnagar, (2011) 5 SCC 234 – Unilateral withdrawal of consent after 18 months in S. 13-B, Hindu Marriage Act petition valid... tower mixer